See on ebay :
*URL removed*
See on ebay :
*URL removed*
Replies sorted oldest to newest
on a sidenote both this blu-ray on ebay and the one on abms do not have the superior audio mix
Cool. I suppose you will post the version with the superiour audio mix then?
I am not going to post the blu ray on ABMS or Jungleland or other because Ollie does not want it and I respect his choice and his great work ; the result is awesome.
I bought the first version of the show then the updated version with new audio
So I find myself with both versions and I sell the first one, that's it.
I am not going to post the blu ray on ABMS or Jungleland or other because Ollie does not want it and I respect his choice and his great work ; the result is awesome.
I bought the first version of the show then the updated version with new audio
So I find myself with both versions and I sell the first one, that's it.
So let me see if I get this straight.
You bought a illegal, pirated bluray from a guy who asked yoy to not upload it to ABMS or other sites.
Then the same guy makes a new version of the bluray, and you buy that one.
Then you still, out of respect for the guy you give your money to of course, still can't upload it anywhere but selling your old illegal, pirated bluray on ebay is fine for both of you?
Fuck it, I'm banning the lot of you. it's been fun but really, I will not have sales on the SPL, silvers and vinyl bootlegs is a gray area that I personally will allow for but burned bootlegs, fuck no.
I am not going to post the blu ray on ABMS or Jungleland or other because Ollie does not want it and I respect his choice and his great work ; the result is awesome.
I bought the first version of the show then the updated version with new audio
So I find myself with both versions and I sell the first one, that's it.
So let me see if I get this straight.
You bought a illegal, pirated bluray from a guy who asked yoy to not upload it to ABMS or other sites.
Then the same guy makes a new version of the bluray, and you buy that one.
Then you still, out of respect for the guy you give your money to of course, still can't upload it anywhere but selling your old illegal, pirated bluray on ebay is fine for both of you?
Fuck it, I'm banning the lot of you. it's been fun but really, I will not have sales on the SPL, silvers and vinyl bootlegs is a gray area that I personally will allow for but burned bootlegs, fuck no.
.
Fuck it, I'm banning the lot of you. it's been fun but really, I will not have sales on the SPL, silvers and vinyl bootlegs is a gray area that I personally will allow for but burned bootlegs, fuck no.
I LOVE YOU SHABBY!
I am not going to post the blu ray on ABMS or Jungleland or other because Ollie does not want it and I respect his choice and his great work ; the result is awesome.
I don't have any words for you right now. But, if I we're to have words for you, they wouldn't be nice.
So let me see if I get this straight.
You bought a illegal, pirated bluray from a guy who asked yoy to not upload it to ABMS or other sites.
Then the same guy makes a new version of the bluray, and you buy that one.
Then you still, out of respect for the guy you give your money to of course, still can't upload it anywhere but selling your old illegal, pirated bluray on ebay is fine for both of you?
Fuck it, I'm banning the lot of you. it's been fun but really, I will not have sales on the SPL, silvers and vinyl bootlegs is a gray area that I personally will allow for but burned bootlegs, fuck no.
Ha-ha-ha. This made me laugh out loud, ShabbyDog! You made shitty day better.
So this jerk post a link to his own auction at ebay? Ban him the fuck out of here.
Fuck it, I'm banning the lot of you. it's been fun but really, I will not have sales on the SPL, silvers and vinyl bootlegs is a gray area that I personally will allow for but burned bootlegs, fuck no.
Well done Shabby Dog!
If I made a decision that pleased both Ern and Stampe, I'd be second guessing myself.
If I made a decision that pleased both Ern and Stampe, I'd be second guessing myself.
If I made a decision that pleased both Ern and Stampe, I'd be second guessing myself.
Watch it Kinsey these Scandinavian pit-bulls have got the taste for blood.
If I made a decision that pleased both Ern and Stampe, I'd be second guessing myself.
Watch it Kinsey these Scandinavian pit-bulls have got the taste for blood.
Finland isn't Scandinavia but yeah I will fuck your irish tight little ass, you little bitch.
If I made a decision that pleased both Ern and Stampe, I'd be second guessing myself.
Watch it Kinsey these Scandinavian pit-bulls have got the taste for blood.
Finland isn't Scandinavia but yeah I will fuck your irish tight little ass, you little bitch.
I hope you are not expecting to get paid as that is grounds for an SPL banning order.
If I made a decision that pleased both Ern and Stampe, I'd be second guessing myself.
Watch it Kinsey these Scandinavian pit-bulls have got the taste for blood.
Finland isn't Scandinavia but yeah I will fuck your irish tight little ass, you little bitch.
I hope you are not expecting to get paid as that is grounds for an SPL banning order.
If I made a decision that pleased both Ern and Stampe, I'd be second guessing myself.
Watch it Kinsey these Scandinavian pit-bulls have got the taste for blood.
Finland isn't Scandinavia but yeah I will fuck your irish tight little ass, you little bitch.
I hope you are not expecting to get paid as that is grounds for an SPL banning order.
No change there then.
If I made a decision that pleased both Ern and Stampe, I'd be second guessing myself.
Watch it Kinsey these Scandinavian pit-bulls have got the taste for blood.
Finland isn't Scandinavia but yeah I will fuck your irish tight little ass, you little bitch.
I hope you are not expecting to get paid as that is grounds for an SPL banning order.
No change there then.
I must admit that I do have a tight ass. One of my best features.
That's a pretty empty threat though, I'm pretty sure Ern suffers from permanent brewer's droop. I'm more worried about him perpetuating the stereotype that Scandinavians are humourless.
So, was DVD banned too?
So, was DVD banned too?
I believe one of them was banned for openly including a link to a bootleg bluray he was selling (naughty, naughty) and the other (DVDDG) was banned for NOT openly admitting that he sells bootleg blurays of DVDs he promotes on this site. It appears that you can include links to bootlegs you or others are selling providing they are vinyl or silver disk versions.
In the good old days, any reference to selling bootlegs including links to other sites would result in the offending post(s) being removed and the person(s) censured. Now it seems a banning order is the minimum punishment. Charlie6310 was arguably stupid, naive and wrong to post what he did but to ban him was completely over the top. Strong censure and an explanation of the rule here would have been adequate.
Unofficial publications are opening advertised on this site with impunity and some members have also openly sought contributions for the purchase of NYCBC bootleg DVDs. Correctly me if I'm wrong but DVDDG has never openly offered blurays for sale on this site. The only time money is mentioned is when others have tried to goad him into admitting that he sells blurays. Sure, he can be a pain in the arse and sure he over promotes his videos and sure to some he is not a likable person but to apparently ban him for NOT admitting that he sells blurays is completely over the top. I suppose if he admitted it he would have been allowed to stay.
Flame away.
So, was DVD banned too?
I believe one of them was banned for openly including a link to a bootleg bluray he was selling (naughty, naughty) and the other (DVDDG) was banned for NOT openly admitting that he sells bootleg blurays of DVDs he promotes on this site. It appears that you can include links to bootlegs you or others are selling providing they are vinyl or silver disk versions.
In the good old days, any reference to selling bootlegs including links to other sites would result in the offending post(s) being removed and the person(s) censured. Now it seems a banning order is the minimum punishment. Charlie6310 was arguably stupid, naive and wrong to post what he did but to ban him was completely over the top. Strong censure and an explanation of the rule here would have been adequate.
Unofficial publications are opening advertised on this site with impunity and some members have also openly sought contributions for the purchase of NYCBC bootleg DVDs. Correctly me if I'm wrong but DVDDG has never openly offered blurays for sale on this site. The only time money is mentioned is when others have tried to goad him into admitting that he sells blurays. Sure, he can be a pain in the arse and sure he over promotes his videos and sure to some he is not a likable person but to apparently ban him for NOT admitting that he sells blurays is completely over the top. I suppose if he admitted it he would have been allowed to stay.
Flame away.
I am not a frequent poster but I agree with what Mando says. I should declare an interest because I have bought a couple of DVDDG BDs and I enjoy watching them. I have never met DVDDG but it seems to me that he is so passionate about what he does that he finds it difficult to respond diplomatically to critical comments and so he ends up annoying people. Perhaps a cooling off period rather than a total ban would be more appriopriate.
Flame away.
Admit it - you're just trying to get into the runaways secret club by bitching at how this site is run. You gotta suck a lot more of c*** to succeess - trust me, I've tried.
Correctly me if I'm wrong but DVDDG has never openly offered blurays for sale on this site.
You're partly wrong but I can't prove it, 'cause those posts are gone. That was before the board update and unfornataly you can't find posts posted before the new board (my first post when using the search engine is jan 26th 2013: "Welcome to the new SPL". I remember getting into a heated discussion with DDG because of his posts about him selling his stuff. He argued that it was ok 'cause he was spending shitloads of ££'s on hard- and software. And I was like: I don't care - DON'T SELL BOOTLEGS ON SPL!
If only the mods had a backup of the old board and posts who could show this guy to the SPL.
But it's true that you get in bad standing with commercial bootleggers if you share their stuff. Way back I bought the 3 Shea shows in 2003 and was one of the first to receive them. I started trading and sharing. When I ordered the xmas shows, I was probably the last one to receive them. When I finally got them they were all over. They kept track of mails and board alias'.
DDG is the same: he puts a gun to the head of all his buyers: if you posts my stuff (that you have paied for) ANYWHERE I will not release any more stuff.
But really: who needs anymore? We got 3 (or is it 4) pro-shots WB shows. And - no offense Germany - Hannover was great for the ones at the show but even for the 95% die-hard bruce-fag is was just another show like all the rest.
And for what it's worth: Danish TV filmed the entire 2012 Roskilde Festival show (multiple cameras and hd-sound) and right now it's just sitting on their hardrives while they're talking to Bruce's management dissussing if and how it should be broadcasted. I hope it ends up on an official release or gets a danish TV special sometimes.
So, was DVD banned too?
I believe one of them was banned for openly including a link to a bootleg bluray he was selling (naughty, naughty) and the other (DVDDG) was banned for NOT openly admitting that he sells bootleg blurays of DVDs he promotes on this site. It appears that you can include links to bootlegs you or others are selling providing they are vinyl or silver disk versions.
In the good old days, any reference to selling bootlegs including links to other sites would result in the offending post(s) being removed and the person(s) censured. Now it seems a banning order is the minimum punishment. Charlie6310 was arguably stupid, naive and wrong to post what he did but to ban him was completely over the top. Strong censure and an explanation of the rule here would have been adequate.
Unofficial publications are opening advertised on this site with impunity and some members have also openly sought contributions for the purchase of NYCBC bootleg DVDs. Correctly me if I'm wrong but DVDDG has never openly offered blurays for sale on this site. The only time money is mentioned is when others have tried to goad him into admitting that he sells blurays. Sure, he can be a pain in the arse and sure he over promotes his videos and sure to some he is not a likable person but to apparently ban him for NOT admitting that he sells blurays is completely over the top. I suppose if he admitted it he would have been allowed to stay.
Flame away.
I agree,
right, I am bloody lost on this thread
Who's been banned?
I'll make one post now that I've calmed down a bit.
Charlie was banned entirely based on this thread. I agree I may have over reacted there and I will sort that out.
DDG was banned based on his record, previous communication between the mods and him on his advetisement. That communication basically said that in the future he would only be allowed to post his ranting video posts if they were related to a upload to JL, ABMS or similar sites with the video he was advertising.
For a while this worked perfectly, he didn't post any more videos and then he found his loop hole. He made downscaled DVD's that he released for free while he still could run his business of the BD's. When he hijacked this thread to let us know that the previously leaked Paris BD that happened to be the same disc that was linked to on ebay here was old and he had made a new one with better sound. No intention of letting people get that version without paying of course, just letting us know that he had done yet another best video ever of the Paris show. Once that happened I just refused to take it any longer and banned him.
Oh, and to clarify my previous post about silvers and vinyl I am thinking of old out of print releases. In my mind that's collectibles, in most cases surpased in quality by later freely available versions anyway. I don't like promoting new bootlegs for sale, no matter the label.
Well said Mando.
Shabby, perhaps you don't realise it but your post is pure hypocrisy. There are any number of threads on this board which are advertising bootlegs for sale or from persons seeking to buy bootlegs. Are all posters on those threads banned? Here are two examples:
https://www.spl-messages.net/to...nki-final-night-2012
https://www.spl-messages.net/to...records-in-september
Ban all or ban none, but be consistent. How is what DVDguy was doing any different from any of those alerting us (whether we want to know or not) to new or upcoming Godfather releases? Selling bootlegs is ok if they're silvers? Pardon?
"We got 3 (or is it 4) pro-shots WB shows"
what did I miss
Rio plus what?
I wish you would try and keep up:
1) Rock In Rio 2012 (Lisboa)
1) Rock In Rio 2013 (Brazil)
And I guees you could count the concert for Sandy Relief as the 3rd
But ok - you could easily confuse the two Rock In Rio for the same show
Well said Mando.
Shabby, perhaps you don't realise it but your post is pure hypocrisy. There are any number of threads on this board which are advertising bootlegs for sale or from persons seeking to buy bootlegs. Are all posters on those threads banned? Here are two examples:
https://www.spl-messages.net/to...nki-final-night-2012
https://www.spl-messages.net/to...records-in-september
Ban all or ban none, but be consistent. How is what DVDguy was doing any different from any of those alerting us (whether we want to know or not) to new or upcoming Godfather releases? Selling bootlegs is ok if they're silvers? Pardon?
One of those had an ebay link to an, aparently, independent third party selling a CD, I've removed that link now.
The second post have a link to a site like brucebase or other information sites, not sales at all as I can tell?
And yes, we do remove and have removed in the past loads of posts where people are pushing their own ebay auctions or blatantly trying to use the pony as a buy and sell list. There is no buy and sell secton on this forum and there shouldn't be.
But even you can see the difference between linking to information about a new release and pushing your own ebay auctions of stuff, no?
Since you asked about the ban, I do agree with you, the ban of Charlie was rough and that has been removed. I still stick by my ban of DDG tough and will continue to do so unless I get "voted of the island" by the other mods.
I wish you would try and keep up:
1) Rock In Rio 2012 (Lisboa)
1) Rock In Rio 2013 (Brazil)
And I guees you could count the concert for Sandy Relief as the 3rd
But ok - you could easily confuse the two Rock In Rio for the same show
aha
I didn't count the first Rio as it's not complete
I don't recall seeing DVD guy posting a link to his own sales, at least not in the past few months. And certainly not above. I also don't recall seeing him link to any ebay auctions, but I could be wrong. And in another post above you make it perfectly clear that DVD guy was not welcome to post information about his new releases in the form of his youtube snippets.
I have no idea who any of the guys touting Godfather records are. For all I know they could be Mario Puzo himself. Maybe you know better. And even you can see (irritating phrase isn't it!) that touting someone else's product is exactly the same as touting your own.
I don't really feel that strongly about this, other than a vague annoyance that I won't have notification here anymore that another free (free) DVD has been released by Olli. It's the inconsistency that irritates me, and you are being inconsistent, protestations to the contrary notwithstanding.
I don't really feel that strongly about this--
Yeah I can see that. Maybe it's time for you to order another BD from DDG? Just try to live with it.
Well done ShabbyDog!
I don't think it is worth to discuss single links to ebay auctions. That is not the point (at least not for me). DDG changed this place to an advertising platform for his business. Although he maybe did not post a direct link to a shop or something, everybody knew what it was about. And in the end it was simply too much, it really made me sad what was going on here in terms of silly advertisement.
I guess Charlie is another story. He is quite new (if Charlie6310 is his first account), so a "yellow card" is enough from my point of view. My respect to Shabby, that he took back his too harsh decision to ban Charlie.
Well played, sir. Well played.
What never seize to amaze me is that people share Bruce Springsteen bootlegs all over the place. Jungleland, ABMS and so on.
Then they purchase a bootleg, and out of respect for some odd reason, they refuse to share with the rest of the community?
Something odd is going on here, and I don't know what it is.
it's ok
i've found one
so i tip my hat
Access to this requires a premium membership.
We do not sell VIP memberships at this time.